A “public option” bank? Yea, and much more!

July 16, 2012

The next failing bank that needs a bailout should instead be taken over by the state or Feds. At least until it can be stabilized and sold. The same for auto and solar companies.

By Jack E. Lohman

As a former business owner, that’s more than I would have been afforded. I’d have had no choice but to close the company and walk the streets with the rest of my employees.

And incidentally, it’s not a matter IF, it’s when. Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan has shown us that the last bailout was a waste of education. Let’s do it right before we have total collapse.

So when the next bank fails…

Let the state or Feds take it over. If we taxpayers are going to fund the failure, we sure don’t want to reward the old management and give them another chance to dip into our pockets. They should be locked out of future management, and perhaps even locked up.

And frankly, with the threat of losing control over their heads, there’s likely to be fewer bailouts!!!

North Dakota has a public option bank and it is working beautifully, with private banks competing. See it here: “Public Banking — it already works in the United States and is catching on! 18 States now scoping it out.

Why stop there?

Indeed having a publicly-owned (??) post office has kept free-market delivery services (like FedEx and UPS) more efficient, though the post office is clearly a bad example.

Not only has it been devastated by the Internet, but it has faced the wrath of corrupt politicians on the payroll of private industry, and doing everything possible to force them out of business. Like demanding that they put away billions of dollars to fund their retirement system for the next 75 years. (Could FedEx and UPS survive that?)

Of course the USPS employee union has not helped matters, demanding that ineffective post offices not be closed for fear of massive layoffs (both of which are direly needed if the company — and jobs — are to survive).

How about a public-option oil company?

Can you imagine how it would be if the Fed (US taxpayers!) had it’s own public-option oil company competing with OPEC and other Arabian suppliers, and kept our gas at $2.50 per gallon? Think of the billions of dollars that would NOT be sent to the middle east but instead going into the US economy!!!

But wait, public entities can’t give campaign cash!!!

Well, that likely eliminates support from Governor Scott Walker and the like, though if he and other politicians were smart they’d jump all over this. Especially Republicans. There could be no better way to win the support of voters than to limit the power of crony-capitalism, and make free-market capitalism real again.

Any compulsory industry that cannot treat the public fairly and legally, without ripping them off, should lose its exclusivity. And for you Wall Street prosecutors, fines less than the booty simply encourage more crimes. Get a calculator!


Walker’s tax breaks are profitable… for his buddies!

June 4, 2012

Guys, we have to get smart about this. Taxes on corporations are passed on to the consumers at the cash register.

By Jack E. Lohman

As a retired business owner with 70 employees in four states, let me assure you that tax breaks would have only filtered down to my salary. But increase my product demand and I’d hire more people in a heartbeat.

Mr. Walker, corporations should have ZERO taxes if they manufacture product in Wisconsin. THAT will attract manufacturers and jobs to the state and more than offset the loss in taxes.

Tax “breaks” serve only one purpose … to create campaign bribes for politicians willing to initiate them, and Scott Walker knows them well. They are targeted at companies willing to share their profits with the politicians. But if all companies got zero taxes, there is no need for related campaign bribes, and politicians hate that!

Aren’t corrupt politicians great?

Now here’s an idea…

How about a new kind of “compliant corporation?” (a) ZERO taxes if products or services are provided by Wisconsin workers. (b) CEO salary limit of 50 times the lowest paid worker. (c) Board of Directors reporting to a shareholder committee rather than the CEO. And (d) company cannot spend money on political system. And a couple of other restrictions that should have been in there for years but weren’t.

So WE have a tough decision: do we protect Walker’s cash flow or attract companies and jobs to the state?

Step #1: clean up the political corruption and then our politicians will make the right decisions on taxes!


Oshkosh Corp. and union in contract impasse!

September 30, 2011

So why are we surprised?

By Jack E. Lohman

Headlines: Oshkosh Corp., union in contract impasse over health care cost increases

There’s only one side of this argument that is 100% wrong: the politicians who stoke the class war fire.

They have (a) refused to fix the healthcare system, and (b) passed free trade laws that make it more attractive to manufacture product in foreign countries and more difficult for U.S. companies to compete.

And they love it! YOU are on the outside looking in, and THEY cry all the way to the bank!!!

At what point in time do we accept that Medicare-for-all *IS* a jobs bill?

How many more jobs must leave the state before our Governor gets smart and fixes this problem?

That some day the wealthy will have to fight off the lower classes, well, they aren’t thinking that far ahead. It started in Madison and made it’s way to Wall Street, and our police are now using pepper spray and other middle eastern tactics on our own people!!!

But they too will fall.

Or, we can fix it before it gets too far out of hand. What’s at stake is our democracy and constitution, though importantly the Fat Cats would like even those to disappear.

Be careful of what you ask for!

YES you could call the Oshkosh workers greedy, but they want to eat!  But more so are the CEOs and shareholders that expect to shaft the workers to increase profits and CEO salaries.

So do we spend money or not spend money, and if not, where do we cut? Are unions pricing themselves out of the market? Is the post office obsolete, or do we need a different model? Are corporations obsolete, and should we revisit the free-market system? Does our constitution need modernizing?

I don’t know all the answers but I do know one thing: If you can’t win the game legitimately, buy the referee!

It’s a tough world, but I would hope that the politicians could referee it without their hands out.


Citizens United, a long but necessary fight

March 28, 2011

It is but one of many fights needed to win back our democracy

By Jack E. Lohman

The basic problem is that money works. Greed at the top and shared with the politicians making or unmaking the laws is killing America. Some call it shared booty, but it is hard not to call them political bribes.

We need non-conflicted leaders; not more of the same. Seriously, how can we help countries convert to a democracy when our own politicians are giving ours away to the Fat Cats that fund their elections?

Indeed we must fight Citizens United. It is a stupid Supreme Court decision that gives corporations even more power than they’ve ever had. But if corporations want to be people, let’s TAX them like they are people! (That’ll change their minds in a quick minute. :-))

Certainly if we muzzle corporations, they’ll just give bonuses to the executives and the CEOs will pay off the politicians instead. And if we prevent money from corporations they’ll just give bonuses to be spent on outside issue ads promoting the corrupt politicians.

So we need several other changes… and quick!

a) Term limits: Like, to *ONE* term!!! ONE 12 year term for senate and ONE 8 year term for House/Assembly and ONE 8 year term for president or governor. It is the 2nd term “need for money” that has corrupted the system, and we’ve learned from the Middle East that lifelong terms are ineffective and corrupting. (But ensure a federal recall ability in the event a leaker gets in.)

b) Close the revolving door: Once in congress, even as a staffer, prohibit lobbying for five years thereafter. And above all, prohibit lobbying with cash in hand.

c) Disclosure: We must publicly fund a website disclosing the votes that every member makes (see votesmart.org), though politicians can do a lot of bad things in the background to block good legislation, and this must be disclosed as well.

d) Corporate reform: Like, giving shareholders (owners) a binding vote on whether they want profits to be sent to politicians and whether they want their corporation to engage in politicking at all. And giving them the final vote on CEO wages and benefits.

e) Corporate taxes: At the very least prohibit tax write-offs of any pay/benefit package over $1m (otherwise the taxpayers essentially fund pay packages). But even better is to make corporates taxes zero and compensate by increasing personal taxes for the wealthy to the old 50% level.

Yea, I know. But tax the hell out of companies and they’ll just pass the taxes to the consumer or offshore even more of their jobs. We have given them a choice: either bring your profits home so they can be taxed, or invest them overseas where they are not taxed. Absolutely stupid! We need ZERO taxes on corporations to encourage them to bring jobs back home, yet increase personal taxes on the wealthy to compensate!

f) Scheduled import tariffs: NAFTA and CAFTA be damned, they are why we are here in the first place. Schedule import tariffs for 2013 and give corporations a chance to bring jobs back home, or face higher prices if they don’t. Those tariffs can help fund our unemployment costs. And how about tying the import tariff to some ratio of their average hourly pay to ours??? What could be fairer?

g) Health care reform: No, not ObamaCare. Germany has an excellent two-tier system that provides VW services to 90% of the public and is taxpayer-funded with required employer contributions. But about 10% of Fat Cats have opted out and bought private policies that allow private rooms in private hospitals with celebrity doctors and private nurses. Most doctors do not make the kind of money in Germany that they do here. On the other hand, if you qualify for Medical School your education is free in Germany.

h) And the biggie: Get our politicians off the payroll of the corporate Fat Cats with public funding of campaigns. Only then will they vote for laws that benefit the taxpayers and our nation’s jobs. I do not want my politician determining this nation’s energy direction when he is on the payroll of nuclear, coal, oil, or clean energy sources. I want him working for ME!

So now I know what “jobless recovery” means. Corporate profits are at an all-time high, CEO salaries and bonuses are up by 30%, and the little guy is still jobless and broke. All thanks to our bought-and-paid-for politicians. Thus item (h) is the most critical of all.

This is clearly not intended to give labor a clean bill; wages are too high in comparison to China and India. Leaders asked for a lot and they got it, all while jobs went elsewhere. The pendulum has swung the other way and we must get real about wages (admittedly, executive wages as well).


Wisconsin should take the lead…

December 6, 2010

Create a new legal entity called a “Compliant Corporation”

By Jack E. Lohman

The following is 100% voluntary for corporations and their management and owners. They can choose to be “compliant” or remain as is, but it is their choice… as it is for their shareholder owners and other investors! The purpose is to give Americans an optional investment mechanism, one that they have confidence in.

Current CEOs and Board of Directors (Board) of corporations are often hired and controlled by a buddy-system Board, and they have control of the proxies.

Under a Compliant corporation the Board is voted in by a majority of the shareholder votes (as usual) but the proxies are voted by an executive committee (Committee) consisting of the top 21 shareholders. Only a shareholder majority may elect Board members, and outside corporate shareholders may not sit on the executive committee.

The CEO of the compliant corporation will be appointed by the Committee but requires a binding vote of the shareholders, and if three or more candidates are offered the vote will be determined by Ranked Choice Voting (IRV/RCV). In all cases of voting, “None of the Above” shall be a voting option.

Current corporations pay their CEOs whatever they wish…

Compliant corporations must limit the compensation packages of the highest-paid employees (each) to no more than 50 times the lowest-paid direct or indirect worker, whichever is lowest.

Current corporations establish CEO and executive compensation via a Board and/or a compensation committee or outside consultant…

Compliant corporations must establish executive salaries using its Committee — taking advice from the Board but with final approval by a binding shareholder vote.

Current corporations may spend dollars as they see fit on political contributions…

Compliant corporations may only spend political money as directed by the Committee and with voting approval by the shareholders.

Current corporations may outsource management to non-connected entities…

Compliant corporations are prohibited from outsourcing management.

Current CEOs can temporarily offload their losses to make their own company look profitable while their salaries are being set by the board, or they are selling shares of stock, all with a buyback guarantee. CEOs can sell their losses for $1 with a promise to later buy them back at $2 after they’ve cheated the shareholders. (Think Enron!)

Compliant corporations may not offload or sell corporate losses without writing such losses off the books, and may not repurchase these losses or buy entities or products that are losing money without permission of the executive committee and a binding vote of the shareholders.

Compliant corporations must employ over 80% of their workers in the United States.

Compliant corporations shall be tax-free.

Compliant corporations shall be allowed to enroll their employees in the Medicare healthcare system at no cost.

Government contracts should be limited only to “Compliant” corporations, and regulations should prohibit compliant corporations from being owned by non-compliant corporations.

I am not a corporate expert and there may be other reforms along this line. I started a company in my basement and in 25 years grew it to 70 employees in 4 states before retiring. I think it is shameful, actually criminal, that we allow CEOs to steal from the shareholders with the help of an “esteemed” board of directors. Of course I feel that way of our “esteemed” politicians as well.

Except for Sen. Bernie Sanders. See his excellent speech on losing the middle-class HERE


Debt Commission proves inept

November 15, 2010

Of course “something” has to be done…

By Jack E. Lohman

In the business world we call that “something” new management and new rules. The current regime under the current rules dug us into the current $14 trillion hole, and the old regime under the same rules did the same thing. Indeed changes are necessary. Some occurred on November 2nd, and we must complete the job in 2012.

How did we get here? State and federal politicians used our cash to repay the Fat Cats for the bribes that funded their elections, and now we taxpayers must pay them back.

The Deficit Commission’s recommended cuts totally omitted the one change that would have kept us out of trouble in the first place, and by itself would ultimately restore our economy:

Get politicians off the payroll of Goldman Sachs and the billionaires that want in our pockets, and let the politicians make unbiased spending decisions that are in the best interest of the nation!

Read that, implement Public funding of campaigns!!!

Now!!!  Stop the looting!!!  Eliminate the political bribes.

Understand how this works…

CEOs want short-term profits to increase their already massive salaries, and are willing to share those profits with the politicians that make it all happen. Thus NAFTA and CAFTA are passed that enable outsourcing to countries with wages one-tenth ours, and they repeal regulations like the Glass-Steagall bill that protected the public from the white-collar crooks’ looting of the system.

The Debt Commission now proposes fixing the problem on the backs of the middle class.

Do you ever get the feeling that the politicians got together and said, “Hey, if we really want the public to cave on this cost cutting, so we have more taxpayer cash for the CEOs who funded our elections, let’s make them really, really bleed… and show projections that get them really, really scared!”

We are now in the process of bleeding and being scared. They are looting. We will soon cave.

We need changes, but not those recommended…

  1. First and foremost, install public funding of campaigns.*
  2. Cut congressional pay and benefits, and put congressmen on a pay-for-performance basis. If the deficit goes up, or SSI and Medicare benefits go down, their personal pay and benefits go down too. No more robbing Peter to pay Paul (where we are Peter and they are Paul!).
  3. Equalize federal employee pay and benefits with the private sector.
  4. Ban pork-barrel projects.
  5. Eliminate Bush’s over-1500 contract security firms in the US and replace them with government employees at 1/5th the cost.
  6. Eliminate the over 50,000 private mercenaries (Halliburton and Blackwater) that cost FIVE times what our US troops cost.
  7. Leave Social Security alone, retirement at 65, but remove the wage cap and extend it to all income; not just wages.
  8. Leave Medicare alone, except extend it to all and remove the 65 year age qualification. Medicare-for-all would make the best corporate bailout, for 100% of employers, and help keep jobs in the US.
  9. Let the Bush tax cuts expire for wages over $300K and eliminate the 15% tax bracket for investment income.
  10. Eliminate subsidies for offshoring jobs (like to India).
  11. Repeal NAFTA and CAFTA.
  12. Audit the FED, maybe even nationalize it and the banks (things are not looking good with QE2 and Goldman Sachs).
  13. Reverse the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act that repealed the 1932 Glass-Steagall bill (reinstall the banking regulations).
  14. Mandate corporate reform, with majority shareholder control over executive wages and political contributions.
  15. Mandate election reforms like Ranked Choice (IRV) voting to make politicians more accountable to the voters.

* But first and foremost, pass “optional” public funding of campaigns, because nothing will get fixed until you do. Even if all else fails, getting politicians off the billionaire’s payroll will untie their hands to make good things happen for the nation.

Our problem is NOT R’s or D’s, but it *IS* two-fold. It *IS* that the politicians are owned by the multimillionaires that want in our pockets, and it *IS* a public that doesn’t yet understand the costs to society.

Live with it; or fix it.

Politicians spend taxpayer dollars because they ARE PAID to spend taxpayer dollars, and robbing the SSI fund (as just one example) gives them the cash needed to attract campaign dollars.


Some things just never go away…

October 11, 2010

We’ve obsoleted many things …

By Jack E. Lohman

Kodachrome, Polaroid, 35mm, 8mm movies, 8 track, cassettes, vinyl records and reel-to-reel tapes have all yielded to digital technology. Telephone booths and land lines have given way to cell phones. Calling (you know, actually “talking to people” on the phone) has been replaced by texting, email and Facebook. Typewriters are gone and digital flat screens are in. Even parking meters and human coin collections are being replaced by electronic credit-card boxes.

These are being replaced with smarter technology.

But some scams avoid the hatchet.

1) The health insurance bureaucracy has become obsolete. It’s like giving the pizza delivery guy a chauffeur; an absolute waste of money on an unneeded service. The insurance scam consumes 31% total (but 20% unnecessary) of health care dollars without ever laying hands on the patient, when that money should be spent on patient care instead. A Medicare-for-all system would be far more efficient without a loss of quality, and would be a boon to 100% of U.S. businesses that hired Americans.

2) Corporations, in their current form. Originally established to protect owners from liability, they are now owned by shareholders (including retirement funds) who have invested dollars and have virtually no say on how their companies are run. These owners should be given a binding vote on CEO tenure and pay, and political contributions. The conspiracy “compensation consultants” should be fired and the shareholders put in their place.

3) Corporate Integrity. Corporations can cheat shareholders out of their dividends through repurchase agreements (“repos,” see definition HERE). Just prior to assessing profits and CEO pay, the executives can sell company debt to another friendly crook for $1, thus making the company look profitable as hell, then give the newly-made star CEO a gigantic pay package, and then buy back the toxic debt for $2. Think “Enron.” It’s also a way of driving stock price up. This should be prosecuted as the fraud it is, and the CEOs and Board of Directors should go to jail.

4) Hiding behind 501(c)(3)’s. Originally created to allow charitable organizations like the Red Cross to operate tax-free, they are now being misused by political organizations (with government permission) to help their “friendly” politicians get elected.

5) The creation of 501(c)(4)’s. They allow special interests to lobby and bribe politicians, all legally. And though there’s nothing wrong with lobbying, when done with cash in hand it becomes bribery. That so-called “transparency” and disclosure Republicans had sought for years, was recently filibustered by those same Republicans. Go figure.

6) Private funding of political campaigns. The biggest scam of them all, because without this bribery and corruption the politicians would never have allowed the other scams in the first place. It is the one scam that crashed our economy and keeps it in a very deep hole. All others are secondary, but the Fat Cats that currently fund the elections love it.

How can this happen?

Cash dollars put in the right political hands can save your current scam and help create others. We can try to correct all of the above or simply take the bribes out of the system and let the others be corrected over time. Because without bought-and-paid-for politicians they will be.

And no, this next election is not going to fix it because the new politicians will start receiving the payola instead. It is the structure that must be changed and the Dems are more willing to do that. Only “optional” public funding of campaigns will correct it.

And God help us if John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are put in the driver’s seat. Even as a moderate Republican I see these guys as too far Right (or too corrupt, whatever your choice).


War is hell. But very profitable!

June 1, 2010

If war is necessary and defense products so critical, why the cash bribes to politicians to create more?

By Jack E. Lohman

If I had a product that was that necessary to win wars, I would expect the politicians to be sending me money instead!

Well, actually, they do, as Peace North in northwest Wisconsin so ably demonstrates:

“Perennial top-ranking defense contractor Lockheed Martin took in $32.1 billion from the federal government in 2006, most of it from the Pentagon. These taxpayer dollars made up more than 80 percent of the aerospace giant’s total revenues. In 2007, Lockheed Martin CEO Robert Stevens (right) took home more than $24 million 787 times the annual pay of a typical U.S. worker ($30,617). That placed the company far over the 100-to-1 standard for good corporate citizenship the pending Patriot Corporations Act proposes. To make matters worse, at the same time CEO Stevens and his fellow executives were lining his pockets with taxpayer dollars, government auditors were accusing the aerospace firm of more than $8 billion in cost overruns on weapons development projects.”

If the trend of defense industry bribes is an indication of what’s in store for us, we Americans are in deep trouble. And in this case the Dems pocketed 59% of the cash and the R’s 41%, which is clear proof that it is illegal payola and they ought to go to jail for it.

To be honest, I don’t know if these wars are necessary or not. But if my politician is going to vote on whether or not we send our troops to their potential death, I’d sure like that he not take campaign bribes from the industry that profits so dearly on his vote. I’d like him not on anybody’s payroll but the taxpayers.

And I worry that our congressmen are arming a private militia (Blackwater) in Iraq, rather than funding more US troops (at 1/4th the cost, of course). Why are we doing this? Because Blackwater can give campaign contributions and our army can’t, and that alone would be bad enough.

But what will happen to this company when the wars dry up? What if they have a crackpot, power-hungry CEO? What if he moves to support one of the fringe wacko groups? Will they close down and simply go away? Or move their taxpayer-paid arms to the US and try to overthrow our own government? Is this the legal, private militia the constitution spoke about, and the gun manufacturers love so much?

Speculation, I know, but this will not have a pretty ending.

And now we have BP…

… who not only paid heavy cash to keep the politicians from enforcing regulations, they even paid off government employees in the agencies tasked with oversight. BP (and others) must be forced to invest in the security cap that would not have stopped the explosion but would have contained the damage, but they bought their way out of that requirement. They found the right regulators to buy off.

Will this corruption ever stop? Only if the voters wise up.

.

Only one thing will turn this around:

  • We must pass the Fair Elections Now Act to allow honest challengers to engage in fair, competitive races.
    .
  • To get there we’ll need to force a 100% turnover in November. ALL incumbent politicians must be unelected. Forced term limits! As long as we keep re-electing the same trash, we will continue on our spiral to a trashed economy.

Yes, I know. “Fair” is not in their vocabularies. That’s why they must go.

No corporation could sustain itself with a corrupt board of directors, and no country can either.


Scott Walker’s “Privatization”

May 26, 2010

Privatization can only work if politicians are clean

By Jack E. Lohman

And this applies to Milwaukee’s taxpayer-owned airport as well, which is doing just fine as it is.

Politicians currently tilt toward privatization because they get a piece of the action through campaign contributions. Eliminate the bribes and we may have a workable formula.

Government clearly is not the only way to provide services, and in one major way it bypasses the profitability of the free-market system that at one time made this country great. But our politicians have frittered away even that value. (But don’t you worry; they did it for a price.)

Yes, government employees are overpaid, thanks to their unions and state and federal negotiators who have no skin in the game so they tend to give away the store. And the employees tend toward the bureaucratic side to protect their jobs. But by and large they are cheaper today than private companies who can get away with gouging the taxpayers if they pay off the right politicians.

The most talked about is the Postal Service. Clearly the Internet email and online billing and payment system has harmed them greatly, thus their recent bent on advertising their shipping capabilities. And the Internet has eaten into the business of FedEx and UPS as well, and helped DHL close its US operations.

The USPS should cut deliveries to 3 days a week, because it’s mostly junk mail anyway. Cutting the delivery personnel by half and closing up their small offices is what a wise CEO would do if it were privatized.

Compare the costs of privatization:

If a product or service’s true costs are = $100

$200 Give the job to the government and they’ll charge: $200 $100 + $100 for waste and bloated bureaucrat salaries
$175 Give the job to a good private company without political overhead and they’ll charge: $175 $100 + $75 for profits and CEO salaries
$750 Give the job to a private company that has politicians on their payroll and they’ll charge: $750 $100 + $50 for profits and another $100 to $500 for CEO salaries and bonuses and political payola

These are guestaments and will vary, but they are based on what the government currently spends on private services such as those provided by Blackwater and Halliburton in Iraq and Afghanistan, where private troops are costing us about five times what we spend on government troops.

Whenever we allow politicians to privatize anything, they expect something in return. Yea, a kickback… from the vendor… in the form of campaign contributions… if the vendor wants to be considered the next time around.

And if the vendor is going to play ball, the politicians will have to return the favor. Which they can, because they control the budget of the government agency overseeing the project. Thus oversight and regulations are minimized.

It’s a costly game we taxpayers are funding.

The only solution is to get the politicians off the payroll of corporations, especially the ones contracting with the government but all others as well. Politicians like to take political money and then pass laws or fail to pass laws, all to benefit their funders.

Why are state coffers in such dire condition? Follow the money. It absolutely doesn’t matter what your issue, you’ll find a politician somewhere in the loop taking cash contributions and pulling the strings. Importantly, good laws that benefit the community do not need political cash to flow. Only bad laws do. Good politicians don’t require bribes; only bad politicians do.


Let the tax games begin…

May 3, 2010

Call it the Harley-Davidson jobs bill!

By Jack E. Lohman

Fact: This country is in deep financial trouble and the poor people can’t pull us out of it.

That’s tough to accept, but the rich guys think they’ve found a way. It’s called a Value Added Tax (VAT), and they’ve even got President Obama talking about it. It transfers the burden to the middle wage earners.

It’s a national sales tax that’s applied at the point of distribution rather than at the cash register. It raises the price of a product from $1.00 to $1.05 (or whatever) and the consumer pays without knowing it.

A national sales tax adds the $0.05 to the $1.00 like all taxes, and the consumer notices it right away. So the VAT lets them slip it to buyers in the dark.

But both penalize product consumption, and that’s the last thing we need right now. We want people to buy, not shy away.

The wealthy folks like the VAT because it is regressive. It spreads the costs over all sectors, regardless of income, and it reduces the need to tax wealthy people. But the little guy feels it and the big guy doesn’t, because a larger percentage of his income is going to taxes, and the rich guy doesn’t notice the hit.

Indeed we need to simplify our tax process.

Zero taxes up to $25K, a progressive tax on all income over $250K-$300K, and a flat tax in the middle. And on all income, including stock options and investments. Not just on claimed wages. And the 15% capital gains tax loophole should be eliminated and all income taxed evenly.

Oh, I know; the rich guys will supposedly invest and create jobs.  But when that happens the jobs are usually in India or China. Otherwise the money gets stashed in off-shore tax havens, and rarely legally.

But even if that trickle-down ploy were to work, then why not have zero taxes for the wealthy and let them invest like hell?

Well, we saw the tumble in jobs after the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, which went mainly to the rich, so no thank you.

Corporate taxes should be zero?

Almost. At least for those corporations who manufacture or provide services that use American labor — and who adhere to reasonable compensation packages for their executives — their taxes should be zero.  That will bring old jobs home and attract new jobs. That, and single-payer healthcare, can keep Harley-Davidson in Wisconsin.

As it is, these companies simply add their taxes to the price of their product anyway, and we reimburse them at the cash register. That’s the way it has to work, but it is counter-productive.

So let’s make hay with this new policy and make our companies and product more competitive with foreign product! What’s not to like about that?

Tax policy to adjust for inequality?

Yea, it’s got to be that way.

Inequality didn’t cause the fall of the economy, it was the other way around. We cannot ignore the massive redistribution of wealth that occurred over the last 20 years. Smart but deceitful financial executives aided by politicians corrupted by campaign cash took the country down, and only the restoration of the lower and middle classes will bring the country and the world back to its feet.

Otherwise we will find ourselves like Thailand, with the poor battling the rich in the streets, and their riches are being spent on security to guard their families. That’s what we call rebellion.

While the world economy collapsed, the Fortune 400 richest Americans increased their wealth by $30 billion. From where did that new wealth transfer from? From the poor and middle classes. It could come from nowhere else. But for better or worse, the perps stole from all countries that had assets, and not just ours. That also makes prosecution more complicated.

It took two decades to get us here and it will take two decades to get us back. And maybe even longer if we don’t get the special interest funding out of our electoral system.

This country flourished, especially when we taxed the rich higher, and we can again. But can we trust the politicians to do the right thing?


Corporate reform is long overdue

April 20, 2010

Am I missing something here?

By Jack E. Lohman

Perhaps I’m biased.

I bought $25,000 of stock in a corporation that I thought had a good idea. Little did I know that the CEO also had a second idea, to drain the shareholder value through high salaries and bonuses, and then put the company belly up. My money went down the tubes, as did many others, though the CEO and executives made out very well.

I don’t like being ripped off, and few folks do. The Fat Cats know that’s just part of the game, because they invented it. And they can afford to play it because they’ll win more than they lose. They have these things like insider trading and cooking the books that keep them whole.

So now Obama wants to take over the banks when they fail, and those shareholder values will go to zero even though they had no say in running the company. But the bankers and their bonuses for failure likely will survive, as they’ll find ways to offshore their wealth.

Unfortunately congress seems not to want to protect the investments of shareholders, as the recent hit on our IRAs will attest. It’s that free-market thingy, don’cha know? We should have known better.

It also seems that congress has had a hands-off policy because the CEOs and boards finance their campaigns to a greater extent than do the shareholders. Campaign cash works as planned, and these CEOs are no dummies.

Corporations (and banks) have been taken over by CEOs and the buddy system; a board of directors where each member sits on each others’ boards and each votes in favor of the others’ pay package. Exorbitant salary, vacation and retirement benefits, stock options, and a handsome golden parachute in the event of an unfriendly takeover or forced change of command. Nice arrangement.

Like, the CEO of UnitedHealth who reaped $100 million by exercising stock options. How nice is that?

And Oh, to ward off potential shareholder lawsuits that claim mismanagement they hire an outside “compensation consultant” to provide a recommendation they can all live with, and that will give the board legal cover in a lawsuit. And they pay these “consultants” very well to ensure an acceptable answer, which comes out of profits to the detriment of the shareholders they rip off.

So we have Fat Cats funding the elections of the politicians who otherwise would pass laws to shield shareholders from corporate corruption. And now the Supreme Court guarantees that these corporations are to be treated like “people” and can give unlimited funds to back the elections of these same politicians.

Is this what they call corporate and political corruption?

The fix?

I’m sure there are many fixes but the first is to give the owners (the shareholders) a binding vote on CEO, executive and board member compensation packages (including stock options and golden parachutes).

The CEOs and boards should run the companies, but the rules should facilitate easy replacement of CEOs and board members in the event of poor management.  And board members should be selected by the shareholders alone, rather than by conflicted CEOs.

As well, corporations may be people but they can’t go to jail. The CEOs therefore should not be able to hide behind the corporate veil, and if they are involved in wrongdoing they should spend the time in jail.

Lastly, the shareholders should have a binding vote over whether, and if so to what extent, and to whom, the company is going to bribe — er, contribute to — in the political system. The same should be true of union members when their dues are being spent on contributions. Nobody’s money should be spent on politicians they don’t agree with, with their money mandated by the personal whim of the CEOs.


Economic Elite Have Engineered an Extraordinary Coup

February 15, 2010

… Threatening the Very Existence of the Middle Class

By David DeGraw

Original Alternet Source

“The American oligarchy spares no pains in promoting the belief that it does not exist, but the success of its disappearing act depends on equally strenuous efforts on the part of an American public anxious to believe in egalitarian fictions and unwilling to see what is hidden in plain sight.” — Michael Lind, To Have and to Have Not

We all have very strong differences of opinion on many issues. However, like our founding fathers before us, we must put aside our differences and unite to fight a common enemy.

It has now become evident to a critical mass that the Republican and Democratic parties, along with all three branches of our government, have been bought off by a well-organized Economic Elite who are tactically destroying our way of life. The harsh truth is that 99 percent of the U.S. population no longer has political representation. The U.S. economy, government and tax system is now blatantly rigged against us.

Current statistical societal indicators clearly demonstrate that a strategic attack has been launched and an analysis of current governmental policies prove that conditions for 99 percent of Americans will continue to deteriorate. The Economic Elite have engineered a financial coup and have brought war to our doorstep…and make no mistake, they have launched a war to eliminate the U.S. middle class.

To those who feel I am using extreme rhetoric, I ask you to please take a few minutes of your time to hear me out and research the evidence put forth. The facts are there for the unprejudiced, rational and reasoned mind to absorb. It is the unfortunate reality of our current crisis.

Unless we all unite and organize on common ground, our very way of life and the ideals that our country was founded upon will continue to unravel.

Before exposing exactly who the Economic Elite are, and discussing common sense ways in which we can defeat them, let’s take a look at how much damage they have already caused.

Buy the Book: The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United  States of America

Casualties of Economic Terrorism, Surveying the Damage

The devastating numbers across-the-board on the economic front are staggering. I’ll go through some of them here, many we have already become all too familiar with. We hear some of these numbers all the time, so much so that it appears as if we have already begun “to normalize the unthinkable.” You may be sick of hearing them, but behind each number is an enormous amount of individual suffering, American lives and families who are struggling worse than they ever have.

America is the richest nation in history, yet we now have the highest poverty rate in the industrialized world with an unprecedented amount of Americans living in dire straights and over 50 million citizens already living in poverty.

The government has come up with clever ways to downplay all of these numbers, but we have over 50 million people who need to use food stamps to eat, and a stunning 50 percent of U.S. children will use food stamps to eat at some point in their childhoods. Approximately 20,000 people are added to this total every day. In 2009, one out of five U.S. households didn’t have enough money to buy food. In households with children, this number rose to 24 percent, as the hunger rate among U.S. citizens has now reached an all-time high.

We also currently have over 50 million U.S. citizens without health care. 1.4 million Americans filed for bankruptcy in 2009, a 32 percent increase from 2008. As bankruptcies continue to skyrocket, medical bankruptcies are responsible for over 60 percent of them, and over 75 percent of the medical bankruptcies filed are from people who have health care insurance. We have the most expensive health care system in the world, we are forced to pay twice as much as other countries and the overall care we get in return ranks 37th in the world.

In total, Americans have lost $5 trillion from their pensions and savings since the economic crisis began and $13 trillion in the value of their homes. During the first full year of the crisis, workers between the age of 55 – 60, who have worked for 20 – 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. “Personal debt has risen from 65 percent of income in 1980 to 125 percent today.” Over five million U.S. families have already lost their homes, in total 13 million U.S. families are expected to lose their home by 2014, with 25 percent of current mortgages underwater. Deutsche Bank has an even grimmer prediction: “The percentage of ‘underwater’ loans may rise to 48 percent, or 25 million homes.” Every day 10,000 U.S. homes enter foreclosure. Statistics show that an increasing number of these people are not finding shelter elsewhere, there are now over 3 million homeless Americans, the fastest-growing segment of the homeless population is single parents with children.

One place more and more Americans are finding a home is in prison. With a prison population of 2.3 million people, we now have more people incarcerated than any other nation in the world — the per capita statistics are 700 per 100,000 citizens. In comparison, China has 110 per 100,000, France has 80 per 100,000, Saudi Arabia has 45 per 100,000. The prison industry is thriving and expecting major growth over the next few years. A recent report from the Hartford Advocate titled “Incarceration Nation” revealed that “a new prison opens every week somewhere in America.”

Mass Unemployment

The government unemployment rate is deceptive on several levels. It doesn’t count people who are “involuntary part-time workers,” meaning workers who are working part-time but want to find full-time work. It also doesn’t count “discouraged workers,” meaning long-term unemployed people who have lost hope and don’t consistently look for work. As time goes by, more and more people stop consistently looking for work and are discounted from the unemployment figure. For instance, in January, 1.1 million workers were eliminated from the unemployment total because they were “officially” labeled discouraged workers. So instead of the number rising, we will hear deceptive reports about unemployment leveling off.

On top of this, the Bureau of Labor Statistics recently discovered that 824,000 job losses were never accounted for due to a “modeling error” in their data. Even in their initial January data there appears to be a huge understating, with the newest report saying the economy lost 20,000 jobs. TrimTabs employment analysis, which has consistently provided more accurate data, “estimated that the U.S. economy shed 104,000 jobs in January.”

When you factor in all these uncounted workers — “involuntary part-time” and “discouraged workers” — the unemployment rate rises from 9.7 percent to over 20 percent. In total, we now have over 30 million U.S. citizens who are unemployed or underemployed. The rarely cited “employment-participation” rate, which reveals the percentage of the population that is currently in the workforce, has now fallen to 64 percent.

Even based on the “official” unemployment rate, just to get back to the unemployment level of 4.6 percent that we had in 2007, we need to create over 10 million new jobs, and most every serious economist will tell you that these jobs are not coming back. In fact, we are still consistently shedding jobs, on just one day, January 27, several companies announced new cuts of more than 60,000 jobs.

Due to the length of this crisis already, millions of Americans are reaching a point where the unemployment benefits they have been living on are coming to an end. More workers have already been out of work longer than at any point since statistics have been recorded, with over six million now unemployed for over six months. A record 20 million Americans qualified for unemployment insurance benefits last year, causing 27 states to run out of funds, with seven more also expected to go into the red within the next few months. In total, 40 state programs are expected to go broke.

Most economists believe the unemployment rate will remain high for the foreseeable future. What will happen when we have millions of laid-off workers without any unemployment benefits to save them?

Working More for Less

The millions struggling to find work are just part of the story. Due to the fact that we now have a record high six people for every one job opening, companies have been able to further increase the workload on their remaining employees. They have been able to increase the amount of hours Americans are working, reduce wages and drastically cut back on benefits. Even though Americans were already the most productive workers in the world before the economic crisis, in the third quarter of 2009, average worker productivity increased by an annualized rate of 9.5 percent, at the same time unit labor cost decreased by 5.2 percent. This has led to record profits for many companies. Of the 220 companies in the S&P 500 who have reported fourth-quarter results thus far, 78 percent of them had “better-than-expected profits” with earnings 17 percent above expectations, “the highest for any quarter since Thomson Reuters began tracking data.”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the national median wage was only $32,390 per year in 2008, and median household income fell by 3.6 percent while the unemployment rate was 5.8 percent. With the unemployment rate now at 10 percent, median income has been falling at a 5 percent rate and is expected to continue its decline. Not surprisingly, Americans’ job satisfaction level is now at an all-time low.

There are also a growing number of employed people who, despite having a job, are still living in poverty. There are at least 15 million workers who now fall into this rapidly growing category. $32,390 a year is not going to get you far in today’s economy, and half of the country is making less than that. This is why many Americans are now forced to work two jobs to provide for their family to hopefully make ends meet.

A Crime Against Humanity

The mainstream news media will numb us to this horrifying reality by endlessly talking about the latest numbers, but they never piece them together to show you the whole devastating picture, and they rarely show you all the immense individual suffering behind them. This is how they “normalize the unthinkable” and make us become passive in the face of such a high causality count.

Behind each of these numbers, is a tremendous amount of misery; the physical toll is only outdone by the severe psychological toll. Anyone who has had to put off medical care, or who couldn’t get medical care for one of their family members due to financial circumstances, can tell you about the psychological toll that is on top of the physical suffering. Anyone who has felt the stress of wondering how they were going to get their child’s next meal or their own, or the stress of not knowing how they are going to pay the mortgage, rent, electricity or heat bill, let alone the car payment, gas, phone, cable or Internet bill.

There are now well over 150 million Americans who feel stress over these things on a consistent basis. Over 60 percent of Americans now live paycheck to paycheck.

These are all basic things every person should be able to easily afford in a technologically advanced society such as ours. The reason we struggle with these things is because the Economic Elite have robbed us all. This amount of suffering in the United States of America is literally a crime against humanity.

This is Part I of David DeGraw’s report, “The Economic Elite vs. People of the USA. ” AlterNet will run Part II in the coming days.

Read more of David DeGraw’s work on Amped Status.

© 2010 Amped Status All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/145667/

Also read How our politicians sold out America, and then throw them all out of office. There is not a politician, state or federal, worth his salt.


The misuse of 501(c)(3) non-profits

January 18, 2010

If taxpayer subsidized, we deserve disclosure.

By Jack E. Lohman

The 501(c)(3) non-profit corporate structure works well when contributing money to charities like the Salvation Army, because your contribution comes off the top of your income before you pay taxes. Thus if you are in the 20% tax range and give $100, you are effectively giving $80 and the taxpayers are paying the other $20 (because the government never receives the $20).

Unfortunately, it also works well for fat cats like George Soros and Rupert Murdock when they want to support their Left- or Right-wing fringe groups. The taxpayers help them in their personal cause, no matter how extreme, and even if it works against the best interests of those same taxpayers.

And it helps corporate CEOs and unions that want to invest in so-called non-partisan (yet biased) “think tanks” like Cato or Heritage, when they want to develop slanted studies that support their agendas and block others (like blocking legislation that would increase their tax liability but increase yours).

Think tanks are often “taxpayer-supported propaganda machines” and I support some of them myself (like Public Citizen and other good-government groups).

Who is “Americans for Prosperity,” for example, and other apple-pie-sounding organizations? Oh, tobacco industry involvement? I didn’t know that. Getting taxpayer subsidies? I didn’t know that either!!!

But that’s the way the non-profit game is played.

This has clearly gone too far and the taxpayers deserve better. We at least deserve disclosure of who we are funding and who we are thus getting in bed with if we send a check.

We deserve to know if a particular propaganda group is working for us or against us; or if they are a front group with a deceptive name that does exactly opposite its appearance.

If our taxes are used to subsidize these propaganda machines, we have a right to know who’s behind them. Business, labor, or the health insurance bad guys.

  • Require a disclosure page on their web site.
  • Mandate disclosure of the top 20 contributors, whether corporations or individuals.
  • If those contributors are also tax-exempt, require disclosure of their top 20 contributors.
  • Mandate disclosure of all of their contributions to politicians or political action committees or other tax-exempt organizations.

Yes, I would apply this to ALL tax-exempt organizations, even the ones I support.

As well, tax-exempts can be used to enhance for-profit corporate salaries, and this must stop!

How? By having the 501(c)(3) collect exorbitant surpluses (“profits” in lay terms) and passing them on to external executives in the form of “management fees” to a for-profit company. This can be done by non-profit hospitals, as an example, and these pass-throughs must be forbidden.

Tidbits

— For-profit corporate law must also be reformed.  Shareholders, the owners of the corporations, are often at the total mercy of Boards of Directors with incestuous ties to the CEOs.

— Board members are often CEOs of other corporations and have this CEO also sit on their board, and they vote in favor of each other’s salaries.

— Shareholders must have 100% control over their CEO’s salary and benefits, as opposed to the zero control they currently have.